|
Action Research Plan
|
||||
|
Goal:
Implementation of interactive learning curriculum and technological
advancements in an effort to improve dropout rates within the Houston
Independent School District and surrounding districts.
|
||||
|
Action
Steps(s):
|
Person(s)
Responsible:
|
Timeline:
Start/End
|
Needed
Resources
|
Evaluation
|
|
Meet with Site Supervisor. Inquire about
the effectiveness of the existing curriculum.
Are the Tech programs up to date as part
of the curriculum? Brainstorm about
ways to improve the curriculum and add technological resources.
|
Mrs.LaJuana Jean (Assistant Principal and
Site Mentor)
And Tweenzette Ross
|
Feb 2013
|
Internship Plan/Draft of Action Research
Plan.
List of investigative questions to access
what is needed?
|
Outline of ideas Specify which ideas will
be the most effective.
What is the next step to begin the
process of implementation?
|
|
Review Board Policies on Technology and
Research Policies for Internet based program
|
Tweenzette Ross
|
Mar 2013
|
Access to HISD policies on tech based programs
|
Determine what advancements are allowed.
Who must approve these advancements and what research information must be
presented.
|
|
Textbook
Selection/
Curriculum Evaluation
|
Mrs. LaJuana Jean/Tweenzette Ross
|
May 2013
|
Permission to participate in beginning of
semester planning.
|
Aid in the selection of resources for the
semester. Strategize on how to introduce E-Book/E-Readers.
Investigate the adoption of specified
curriculum in the district .What is the basis for the adoption of said
curriculum.
|
|
Student Participation/Behavior
Evaluation
|
3rd-5th grade teachers/Mrs.
LaJuana Jean
|
June 2013
|
Interviews from a group of
students/teachers. Compiled to figure out what motivates students to learn?
Access to record of behavioral issue and rehabilitation
|
Student Motivation techniques,
Proposal for interactive learning
implementation.
|
|
Collaborate with Co-Curricular
Coordinator
|
Tweenzette Ross/Co-Curricular
Coordinator/
Mrs.LaJuana
Jean
|
Sept .2013
|
List of Co-curricular activities on
campus in order from least to most effective based on student success.
|
Collect and analyze data as it relates to
student success. Improve or remove activities that are not successful.
|
|
Family Intervention
|
Mrs. LaJuana Jean/Tweenzette Ross
|
Oct. 2013
|
Permission from Site Supervisor/Asst.
Principal
|
Family accountability, encouraging families
to motivate the student learning at
hone
|
|
Professional
development questionnaire
|
Tweenzette Ross
|
Nov.2013
|
Questionnaire findings on past, current and
future professional development and the usefulness of the development
|
Are these developments focused on diverse
populations of student body and at risk students? What trainings are required in computer and
information technology?
|
|
Monitoring Academic Progress
|
Mrs.LaJuana Jean
|
Feb.2014
|
Grades, progress reports, teacher/student
evaluations
|
How have student academics been improved
over the course of this process? Determine what changes may become permanent?
|
Sunday, December 16, 2012
This is my original Action Research Plan with the minor revisions of my site supervisor.
Saturday, December 8, 2012
|
Action Research Plan
|
||||
|
Goal: Implementation of interactive
learning curriculum and technological advancements in an effort to improve
dropout rates within the Houston Independent School District and surrounding
districts.
|
||||
|
Action Steps(s):
|
Person(s) Responsible:
|
Timeline: Start/End
|
Needed Resources
|
Evaluation
|
|
Meet with Site Supervisor. Inquire about the effectiveness of the
existing curriculum.
Are the Tech programs up to date as part of the curriculum? Brainstorm about ways to improve the
curriculum and add technological resources.
|
Mrs.LaJuana Jean (Assistant Principal and Site Mentor)
And Tweenzette Ross
|
Feb 2013
|
Internship Plan/Draft of Action Research Plan.
List of investigative questions to access what is needed?
|
Outline of ideas Specify which ideas will be the most effective.
What is the next step to begin the process of implementation?
|
|
Review Board Policies on Technology and Research Policies for Internet
based program
|
Tweenzette Ross
|
Mar 2013
|
Access to HISD policies on tech based programs
|
Determine what advancements are allowed. Who must approve these
advancements and what research information must be presented.
|
|
Textbook
Selection/
Curriculum Evaluation
|
Mrs. LaJuana Jean/Tweenzette Ross
|
May 2013
|
Permission to participate in beginning of semester planning.
|
Aid in the selection of textbook for the semester. Strategize on how
to introduce E-Book/E-Readers.
Investigate the adoption of specified curriculum in the district .What
is the basis for the adoption of said curriculum.
|
|
Student Participation/Behavior
Evaluation
|
3rd-5th grade teachers/Mrs. LaJuana Jean
|
June 2013
|
Interviews from a group of students/teachers. Compiled to figure out what
motivates students to learn? Access to record of behavioral issue and
rehabilitation
|
Student Motivation techniques,
Proposal for interactive learning implementation.
|
|
Collaborate with Co-Curricular Coordinator
|
Tweenzette Ross/Co-Curricular Coordinator/
Mrs.LaJuana
Jean
|
Sept .2013
|
List of Co-curricular activities on campus in order from least to most
effective based on student success.
|
Collect and analyze data as it relates to student success. Improve or
remove activities that are not successful.
|
|
Family Intervention
|
Mrs. LaJuana Jean/Tweenzette Ross
|
Oct. 2013
|
Permission from Site Supervisor/Asst. Principal
|
Family accountability, encouraging families to motivate the
student learning at hone
|
|
Professional
development questionnaire
|
Tweenzette Ross
|
Nov.2013
|
Questionnaire findings on past, current and future professional development
and the usefulness of the development
|
Are these developments focused on diverse populations of student body and
at risk students? Training in computer s and information technology
|
|
Monitoring Academic Progress
|
Mrs.LaJuana Jean
|
Feb.2014
|
Grades, progress reports, teacher/student evaluations
|
How have student academics been improved over the course of this
process? Determine what changes may become permanent?
|
Sunday, December 2, 2012
Action Research Reflections
Week 2 of EDLD5301 was very informative. We watched interviews by
three school district leaders who were very informative and gave really good
insight into the process of performing action research. Here are my thoughts on
the videos of two of these leaders.
I selected the interviews from Dr. Timothy Chargois, Director of Research, Planning and Development in Beaumont ISD and Dr. Kirk Lewis, Superintendent, Pasadena ISD.
Dr. Chargois’ interview was extremely
informative. He talked in detail about what the direction that Beaumont ISD has
taken, teaching teachers how to be more data driven. The district is using
software that transforms data that will impact the way teachers teach today and
in the future. Dr. Chargois mentioned an action research project being
performed in the district. Surveys have been taken about the ethical
responsibility teachers have to their students and their achievement. The study
exams ethical situations and how they affect teachers as well. Beaumont ISD is
receptive to quality qualitative data that help student’s performance.
Dr.Chargois made sure to stress that the district is open to student research
as long the identity of students and staff are protected, there is parental
approval and the data obtained by the research is readily available to be
accessed by the district for approval.
Dr. Kirk Lewis spoke very highly of a grant
funded research project called “Expectation Graduation,” which prepares
incoming 9th grade student for on time graduation. The district took
the initiative to change instructional core curriculum to beef up vigor for the
students and teachers in an effort to decrease dropout rates within the school.
Dr. Lewis also stressed the importance of obtaining data in order to be able to
analyze and apply any applicable research outcomes. Dr. Lewis also stated that
Pasadena Independent School District looks at research from other districts and
translates it to what is being done on campuses within the district. One thing
that really stood out was how Dr. Lewis stressed was that an action research
plan should be practical. Dr. Lewis states that interested and focused students
benefit more from practical research than research that are theoretical.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)